On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:42:10PM -0700, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I dunno, I think I agree with Andriy's initial reaction. > > It's not broken, why fix it? There are so many people > > that link to winehq.com - do we really want to confuse > > them at this point? > > Agreed. There is no way we can fix all references to winehq.com out > there, so any attempt at changing it will only result in major > confusion. And we would have to start using winehq.org email addresses > too, which would likely double the amount of spam we get <g> OK, I agree that these are all concerns to think about (especially the SPAM one ! <g>), but every single Open Source project out there usually uses a .org domain, so I think we should make the switch, and if we decide to do it, then we should do it now instead of later.
Anyway, IMHO doing or not doing such a thing should be decided via voting in the Wine community (unless CodeWeavers is definitely against a switch, as they're hosting .com/.org; IOW: veto right). Anyone care to do that voting ? Or should I simply volunteer to collect "votes" ? You could hardly call this "transparent" voting, though, since I'd be the one to collect (and manipulate ;-) them then. Or what about creating a BugZilla bug instead for the voting process ? That way you'd have transparent voting, and after all it is a project activity, so using BugZilla for that would be at least a slight bit justified. -- Andreas Mohr Stauferstr. 6, D-71272 Renningen, Germany Tel. +49 7159 800604 http://mohr.de.tt
