"Steven Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's much larger work than just #ifdef'ing the code. First of > > all, all 32-bit code should be rewritten to not rely on the > > 16-bit counterparts. > > Does that much of the Win32 code depend on Win16? > I thought they were mostly indepenant of each other in the WINE sources.
Yes, most of the 32-bit code doesn't rely on the 16-bit APIs, so you can start your work with truely separated 16/32 dlls. But *there are* places where 32-bit code relyes on the 16-bit parts. And what is more important, is to decide how 32-bit and 16-bit code should be separated. I vote for moving them to separate files as Alexandre did it for dlls/user/wnd16.c and dlls/user/wnd16.c for instance. -- Dmitry.
