Francois Gouget wrote: >... >I propose to use what would hopefully be better concepts to replace the >following meta-bugs: > > * bug 35 - Wine 0.9.0 Meta Bug > http://bugs.winehq.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=35 > > Instead we could tag all the bug that should be fixed in Wine 0.9.0 >with the 0.9.0 target milestone. > > * bug 395 - Tasklist > http://bugs.winehq.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=395 > * bug 455 - FIXMEs > http://bugs.winehq.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=455 > * bug 406- Tasklets > http://bugs.winehq.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=406 > > These three could be replaced by keywords: Tasklist, FIXMEs and >Tasklets. Then these bugs can be replaced with a query that returns the >bugs that have these keywords. > >... >
I agree that this would be much better. At lindows, we use a system just like the one you described here in our bugzilla because it's so important to be able to easily query the pending bugs for a release, which changes rapidly and often. -- michael cardenas lead windows compatibility engineer lindows.com . hyperpoem.net . "Be the change you want to see in the world" -Mahatma Gandhi