On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:11:59PM -0700, Medland, Bill wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alexandre Julliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > That's a common problem with Win9x dlls. It cannot be completely fixed > > because we don't control the layout of our address space; there are > > some hacks that could be done in the loader to make it less likely to > > happen, but I'm not convinced it is worth the trouble. Our efforts > > would probably be better spent making sure the builtin versions of the > > offending dlls work properly. > > > > -- > > Alexandre Julliard > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Thanks Alexandre. I guess the lesson is to use NT dlls wherever possible. No way. Wine still has lots of problems with NT DLLs, since they are... NT DLLs ;) Wine's support for NT API is too damn incomplete, so you'll have more luck with Win9x DLLs in most cases. Or just choose to not use *any* Windows DLLs. Might help.
-- "My attitude is, everybody should try competing with Microsoft once in their life. Once." - Marc Andreessen, former Netscape lead employee, in a "browser wars" interview
