Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Raul Dias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> After building I have to use an ugly make install
>> in orther to install it into another dir that is different
>> from the one.
>
>What's so ugly about that make install? Could you show us the
>commands you are using?
make \
prefix=%{buildroot}%{_prefix} \
bindir=%{buildroot}%{_bindir} \
libdir=%{buildroot}%{_libdir} \
mandir=%{buildroot}%{_mandir} \
dlldir=%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name} \
includedir=%{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name} \
datadir=%{buildroot}/%{_datadir} \
LDCONFIG=/bin/true \
install
just notice that I build as a non-root user.
%{...} are macros expanded to path names.
>
>> So what I really would like to know is
>> which way is the right way to install wine in a dir different
>> than %prefix or /usr/local (default %prefix)?
>
>The right way is to run configure with the final prefix, run make, and
>then run make install with the prefix set to the package build
>location.
>
just setting the prefix in the make install won't work.
>> Is there any chance to get a DESTDIR implemented in the Makefiles?
>
>Sure, if there is a good reason for it.
I hope that this is :)
[]'s
Raul Dias
