Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Raul Dias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> After building I have to use an ugly make install >> in orther to install it into another dir that is different >> from the one. > >What's so ugly about that make install? Could you show us the >commands you are using?
make \ prefix=%{buildroot}%{_prefix} \ bindir=%{buildroot}%{_bindir} \ libdir=%{buildroot}%{_libdir} \ mandir=%{buildroot}%{_mandir} \ dlldir=%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name} \ includedir=%{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name} \ datadir=%{buildroot}/%{_datadir} \ LDCONFIG=/bin/true \ install just notice that I build as a non-root user. %{...} are macros expanded to path names. > >> So what I really would like to know is >> which way is the right way to install wine in a dir different >> than %prefix or /usr/local (default %prefix)? > >The right way is to run configure with the final prefix, run make, and >then run make install with the prefix set to the package build >location. > just setting the prefix in the make install won't work. >> Is there any chance to get a DESTDIR implemented in the Makefiles? > >Sure, if there is a good reason for it. I hope that this is :) []'s Raul Dias