On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 "Medland, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > >> On Wednesday, August 14, 2002 Ove Kaaven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
<snip> >> WS_OVERLAPPED is in practice considered the absence of the >> WS_POPUP and >> WS_CHILD flags, I believe. > >Thanks Ove; that'll do for a working hypothesis. (I wish Microsoft would be >consistant) > >Just for the record it is clearly more complex than that. I guess since >Microsoft wrote it we can trust Spy++ a little. I have seen spy++ declare >that a "tooltips" class window (style 0x84800000/00000088) has style >WS_OVERLAPPED whereas a "tooltips_class32" class window (style >0x84800003/00000088) doesn't. Hmm, this is just a wild guess but couldn't it be that the WS_OVERLAPPED style applies only to the lower word of the windows style. Windows coming from 16bit DOS it wouldn't be surprising if the original windows style was 16 bit only as well. Either that or Spy++ has a bug, even though you trust it so much ;-). Rolf Kalbermatter mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
