On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, Tony Lambregts wrote: [...] > I would suggest that "apifailure" would be better (and longer..) but > It would be great to have this.
The problem with apifailure (and api*) is that it may be the test that is wrong, not the API implementation. Also I would like something that reminds people this is about the conformance tests (previously known as regression tests). Maybe 'conformance' would work? -- Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fgouget.free.fr/ Linux, WinNT, MS-DOS - also known as the Good, the Bad and the Ugly.
