"Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Conformance test was run under Win98,Me and Windows 2000 and has been > > fixed to produce 0 failures under win2000. Behaviour of some functions > > is very different between 98/Me and 2000. Win98 and WinMe behave equally. > > There are still a number of failures under NT 4.
May I see a log? Do I need to fix them, or someone with NT4 around should look at it? > > I'm not sending it to wine-patches because I'm not sure that we need all > > that tests for 98/Me and 2000 differences. In any case we will not be able > > to emulate behaviour of all Windows platforms. > > I don't think we should try, or even test for it. If Windows behaves > differently in all versions then we can behave as we like. And there > is no point in adding tests for that, at least until we find an app > that depends on the platform differences. I asssume we should adhere win2000 behaviour. Am I right? I'll remove redundant tests for unicode_OS and resubmit patch then. One more question: should we add a point out in the test that tests are platform specific? -- Dmitry.
