> Patrik Stridvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Of course compiling every DLL with the Microsoft headers requires > > fixing all of include/wine/ but then as long as we have a solution > > when we get where eventually is good enough IMHO, doing that is no > > particular rush. Having the Wine tests work properly sooner > > rather than later is much more important though. > > I agree getting the Wine tests to work soon is important, but you > don't really need the final header organization for that; you can > easily work around the current problem by copying files around or > specifying an absolute -I option.
True. I have already done so. It works. Patch posted to wine-patches. > I don't think we have found a fully satisfying solution yet, and IMO > the situation will be clearer when the dll separation is finished and > the loose ends are cleaned up, so I'd prefer to wait until then to > decide on the final structure. OK. As you wish. > (And my secret hope is that by then we > will be able to switch to Subversion which should make renaming files > a lot easier; but that's another topic...) Ah, nice. :-)
