On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:33:14 -0400, you wrote: > On October 18, 2002 03:35 am, Rein Klazes wrote: > > It does. > > Finally! I had nightmares about it... :) > > > Now it crashes again like it did after the change in rev. 210 > > You mean that 209 worked fine, and 210 crashes?!?
209 does not crash and 210 crashes. I checked again to be sure. > That was supposed to be a noop change... I looked at it again, > and there's not much to it. > > Listen, I need your help to fix it, as I'm running out of time. > Can you take 209, and then apply bits of the changes until you > find which one does it? If you don't know how to do that, let > me know, and I'll try to come up with some patches. No problem. Hopefully I can do that later today. Rein. -- Rein Klazes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
