On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 01:17:43PM -0700, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > i'm not 100% sure what -DWINE_NO_STRICT should do, but i suspect it > > should negate the effect of -DSTRICT. The attached patch enables that > > and lets wine compile with -DSTRICT where WINE_NO_STRICT isn't defined. > > WINE_NO_STRICT not only undoes the effect of -DSTRICT, but it also > makes handles UINTs, which -DSTRICT is not supposed to do. And the > idea was that -D__WINE__ would implicitly force -DSTRICT so that you Ok, that makes sense.
> don't have to specify it. But I agree the #ifdefs could be improved so
> that it still works even if you add -DSTRICT. Something like the patch
> below should work I think.
Yes, it works, could you please commit it?
thanks
bye
michael
--
Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199
System Administration Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hauptstaetterstr. 58 http://www.redhat.de/
D-70178 Stuttgart
msg12592/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
