On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:26:15PM +0200, Zsolt Rizsanyi wrote: > But the recent interrupt changes tend to cause cvs conflicts and to break it. > This patch is supposed to work only if winver is nt40 so very probably this > applies only to NT. ... > I would like if this could be fixed properly and that would work with the > safedisk patch, if thats possible.
and on 28 May 2002 18:58:51 -0700, Alexandre wrote: >Laurent Pinchart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> There are two patches in there. The first one sets a fault handler for the >> SharedUserData. This looks fine to me, and will probably be applied when >> memory/emulate.c will be applied. > >It still isn't clear to me why you need a fault handler at all. You >could simply put the right data into it at allocation time. > >> The second one has been written by Alexandre to fix the process suspension at >> creation time. Once again I'd like to hear from him to know what he doesn't >> like about the code, as he's the one who wrote it :-) > >The main problem is that it isn't generic enough, it only applies to >the create process request but other requests have the same problem >and should be fixed too. I'll work on a more general solution. I looks like the more general solution was never done due to time/lack of nagging reasons? Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I found out that "pro" means "instead of" (as in proconsul). Now I know what proactive means.