David Laight wrote:
Also be aware that strncpy/strncat are required to zero out theYes, and we don't really want the performance penalty in this case. In my last patch I've refrained from using strncat(x, y, 1), rather using strcat(x, y). There are other ways of doing this, i.e. strcat in this case might not be the best/fastest, my first priority is getting the stuff acceptable to all and into cvs and then making incremental adjustments to squeeze the most out of it.
unfilled part of the buffer. This is a performance penalty you
don't (normmaly) want.
Greetings,
Jaco
