> --- Greg Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Beware of this one, It's long, and I've spliced > together at least two > (three?) posts, and probably quoted things > out-of-order...
First off, everything seems in order to me... but thats just me... [-snip-] > to work, and may not get right? Why make getting > > it right harder by > > adding a lot of complexity, instead of adding > > infrastructure? > > good point, that seems like the logical way to > proceed. I totally agree here, we should always implement things and get them working properly before we get them working fast, or else we become like the evil empire ;) > Also: we could, indeed, implement wine-rpcss as you > mention. Since it's > not properly a "subsystem" in the MS sense of the > term, maybe it's > called "wine-epmap" but that's just semantics... > what you describe is > totally doable, and we could convert from some > low-level kludgy > implementation to an RPC-based implementation once > the necessary > marshalling was in place... I'll give this serious > thought. ok well if it is doable, i believe we should do it, why focus on the stuff that is _truely_ hard and that we may possibly not know jack shit about when we can get the _easier_ (not necessarily easy) stuff out of the way first, that will lead to a more solid codebase with which to work with. > Back to Ove: [snip] > heh, I know how that goes. Your insights, alone, > are helpful and > appreciated; get well, and we will collaborate on > this when you have > the time to devote to it. yes please, do get better soon, i may be coming down with something myself, my friend/roommate's ex may be the one that gave it to me too :( she is in the hospital now with an abcess on her tonsils, and i may have (somehow) gotten something from it, as I now have a sore throat... -Dustin P.S. nice quote Greg ;) __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
