Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > IDL-generated files would also eventually obsolete all the current > wine/obj_*.h files, but those obj_* files seem to be somewhat more > logically structured than MS's own IDL files, should we craft Wine's IDL > files accordingly, and maybe have some top-level .idl files in include/ > and some sub-.idl files under include/wine/, like it's done now in e.g. > objidl.h?
No, I think we should follow the Microsoft way. Sure it's a mess, but so is the rest of the API anyway... And every time we tried to do things better than Microsoft we ended up having to revert it. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
