On Friday 01 November 2002 10:21 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Greg Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This guy needs a name if I'm ever going to start coding it. How > > about: Wine Remote Procedure Call System Server aka wrpcss.exe.so? > > A little misleading with the "ss" thing, but this name will look > > familiar to windows users, and is more accurate than my previous > > idea of wine-epmap, since it will eventually need to do more than > > just endpoint mapping. > > If it's ever going to be compatible with Windows rpcss.exe then we > should use the same name. Otherwise winerpcss.exe would probably be > better to avoid potential name collisions.
That's a good question... would/should/could our thing ever be compatible with the windows one? My pseudo-educated guess is no/no/no, mostly because its a windows subsystem, and hence operates at a lower level than wine... but I'd like to hear Ove's opinion (or anyone else's, of course). -- gmt "The purpose of government is to rein in the rights of the people" --President Bill Clinton, MTV interview, 1993