On November 1, 2002 04:51 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > True, the term is overloaded; let's call them phase 1 and phase 2. IMO > phase 1 is mandatory for 0.9 (and we are pretty close to it); phase 2 > should be well under way for 0.9, but doesn't necessarily need to be > 100% done, as long as we can fix the remaining ones for 1.0 without > having to redesign everything.
OK, the reason I was proposing 0.8 as a separate release from 0.9 is that I though 0.9 entails completion of phase 2. > Well, I think it is a feature, you need to be able to specify an init > function. Only it will default to DllMain so in 99% of the cases you > won't have to know about it. Well, true, but we can make it a command line argument, just like we did with the other out-of-band .spec directives. Sorry, I was not clear. -- Dimi.
