--- Lionel Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Stupid question that will probably be ripped to shreds but what about if
> we
> > release the binaries with copy protection support but not put it in CVS
> > (kinda like transgaming, except that users dont have to pay for the
> binaries)?
> 
> It's illegal according to the LGPL as far as I know (except, of course, if
> all (c) holders accept to do an exception to the rule :-) ).
> 
> I may be wrong though :-)
> 
>From my understanding of the LGPL, only offspring have to recontribute to the
main branch (i.e. transgaming would have to recontribute any changes to
winehq if they used any of winehq's code, post license switch, unless
alexandre agreed to allow them not to)  I dont know of any place where it
says that the main branch cant put one thing into binary releases that they
leave off of the source release...

Of course, I could be wrong as well... <g>

-Dustin

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/

Reply via email to