On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 11:19, Dustin Navea wrote: > --- Sylvain Petreolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >Excuse me if I feel scared, but is this Appdb or something else ?? > > > > > > No. It should be a group of applications tested by wine > > > developers (or application mantainers) and what should work more > > > or less flawless (without native dlls). It should be the screenshot > > > section. > > > > In this case Appdb is already there, and only needs a maintainer. > > No need to duplicate work. > > > > If you disagree, listen to what you wrote and compare it with Appdb > > contents... > > > b) A index page with a table: > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > | Name | Version | Status | > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > | Internet Explorer | 5.5 | XXX-- | > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > .... > > > and a page for every application. > > > > Problem with using the AppDB is that it is highly disorganized, and most of > the apps are non-working in there, his suggestion his that we only list > 'officially' tested and working apps on this/these page(s) AFAICS..
Maybe you could add a "Wine tested/Approved" Stamp or something similiar to AppDB (Approved image displays if column 'Approved' = 'Y'), then display all and sort by that column. No duplication. Rick > -- -- Rick Romero IT Manager Valeo, Inc. ph: 262.695.4841 Sussex, WI. fax: 262.695.4850 [EMAIL PROTECTED]