--- Tony Lambregts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sylvain Petreolle wrote: > > >Like Vincent said, the most convenient form of the doc (I think), fails > >when you do : > > > > > >>2b. make html > >> > >> > > > >See bug #688 http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688 > > > > > > > When I run "./make_winehq" (with the docbook packages installed) it > produces the html files in wine-doc with meaningfull names but "make > html" produces xNNNN files (just like bug report) so make_winehq is the > prefered method, yes? Is it realy a bug then? > > > I think that at the beginning of the document we had a getting started > section. This section would tell the developer that they needed to > install have jade, tetex, docbook and perl installed in order to create > html, pdf, and ps files from the sgml files. There should be links to > the section on what is required for the various distrbutions and what > command to run (./make_winhq). > > Right now there is only the section for RedHat . I would be really nice > if we had sections for other distributions as well > > The sections on setting up the docbook from section 3.2.1.4 on needs > work since it contains a lot of sections that are incomplete and to a > large extent it is unclear (to me) what is required. > > As I pointed out before there is a bug about this > http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727 > Right, I have it in my TODO
-Dustin P.S. I will probably end up rewriting a lot of the docs to get them to a usable state, but it will take some time. Dimi: If you could post on the Wine 0.9 v0.x that a backup docs guy is needed, it would be greatly appreciated. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos http://launch.yahoo.com/u2
