On 8 Nov 2002, Marcus Brubaker wrote: > Why not just address that critique of emulators in the specific context > of WINE? Personally, I think that would be more effective. Something > like "And while some may think that emulators are doomed to painfully > substandard performance...." And then fill in with arguments > like...well, wine isn't REALLY an emulator persay...or something like > that.
If going that way you can use the following: Debunking Wine Myths 1. Myth 1: "Wine is slow because it is an emulator" http://www.winehq.com/about/index.php?myths -- Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fgouget.free.fr/ Linux, WinNT, MS-DOS - also known as the Good, the Bad and the Ugly.
