Re: Help support

[Eric Pouech]

Alexandre Julliard a écrit :
> 
> Eric Pouech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > so do you prefer:
> > 1/ hacky 16 bit block, still Win9x compatible
> > 2/ DDE implementation, but incompatible with any native winhlp32/winhelp
> 
> We definitely don't want 16-bit hacks in the messaging code, we should
> try to do things as NT-like as possible. Running Win9x winhlp32 is not
> really important IMO.
I'm afraid the NT way is not possible. As Uwe stated, it includes
writing message "body" to 0x7ffe0000 shared page. So, I don't think
we're ready for it (especially as an IPC mechanism)
so I'll go for dde
A+