On Sunday 17 November 2002 01:26 am, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > "Greg Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > totally untested, but it does compile, and seems logical > > enough. while i was at it, i added a few more. > > Probably it would be better to create a common internal > function which accepts C1_???? flags, does all remaining > common operations with converting character(s) to unicode > and returns (ctype & flags) != 0?
Yes, I guess you are right, assuming this implementation really works, and these functions will remain as-is, without requiring a bunch of individualized tweaking...? I'll try again. -- gmt "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight; nothing he cares about more than his own personal safety; is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better persons than himself." -- John Stuart Mill
