On Wednesday 04 December 2002 02:31 am, Francois Gouget wrote: > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Greg Turner wrote: > [...] > > > Anyhoo, yes, I like something like what you are doing better, it > > seems that if anything might just break out of the blue, it would > > be the unicode version, right? So I should have done more like > > that and that way wine doesn't lose the test. knowing there's no > > crash involved makes the difference, I guess. > > Submitting for inclusion then :-)
well, if it doesn't crash, I say we'd might as well run the tests but show traces instead of "ok"'s on failure.... I really wish there was a "whatever" macro that took the same syntax as "ok" but didn't constitute failure (or is there? perhaps I should make one?) Anyhow, until I make my mind up or whatever, Francois' patch is fine by me, considered rpc_J_PL4-r0 if it's OK to call it X11. -gmt
