"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, that's the idea, really. But I have to find a way to mark the > special .o files somehow. I don't think just touching them works, > because of possible separate source and build trees.
I think it would work, the .res is going to be in the build tree too. You could also create a symlink if you are concerned about that. But maybe a better approach would be to simply output the .res into a .o and have winebuild check the file header to recognize when an object file is a .res in disguise; this way you don't need an intermediate .res. > BTW, storing the .res content in the .o file has the small benefit > that resource compilation happens at the expected place in the > build process, but I guess we can defer it to winewrap, no problem. Not sure what you mean here; the .res is already compiled anyway. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]