On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Marcus Meissner wrote: [...] > > What should we do? Should we have kernel32 import lz32 and forward the > > LZ functions it? Or should we do like Windows, which means moving the LZ > > APIs to kernel32, and turn all the entry points in lz32 into forwards > > pointing to kernel32 like on Windows? > > If the LZ APIs are exposed from kernel32 ... Then I would say yes. > > Will the forwarding work for the 16bit version too?
I'm not sure. I don't have the export tables of the 16bit libraries so I don't know what XP does. I'm hoping that if krnl386.exe does not export the lzexpand API then we can cleanly separate it in lzexpand by just calling the 32 version. -- Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fgouget.free.fr/ Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he'll be a mile away - and barefoot.
