> >> W2K results from the current tests as downloaded from > >> http://fgouget.free.fr/wine/winetests.zip > >> > >> They seem to match the WinXP tests mostly ;-). > >> > >> Just one remark. The tests output all there results on stderr so to > >> redirect > >> all info into a file when starting the batch file the command > >> > >> runtests.bat>>result.txt 2>&1 > >> > >> seems very useful. This may not work on Win9x command prompts but it > >> does on > >> W2K and XP. > > > runtests.bat>>result.txt 2>&1 does not work on Windows 98 and it is not > likely to work on any Win9x.
That's what I suspected. I didn't have the time to test it on Win95 but was pretty sure that cmd.exe on Win9x would not be supporting these Unix like features. > > I wondered if the problem was output going to stderr. I had not had > > a chance to take a good look at it. Is there anyway to tell the *test > > programs* (i.e. not the script) to send output elsewhere, such as > > stdout? If not it should be added. Then piping to a file should work > > without any special incantations in Windows. This is significant to me > > now, as I am taking up Win98SE testing. > > > Is there any reason that I should not put a patch together that changes > the calls to stderr to stdout? As far as I'm concerned I don't see why test results should go to stderr. But I do not know about the possible background on Unix platforms for this. If you want to do a patch I think this would be helpful and then see if Alexandre is committing it ;-) Rolf Kalbermatter