Can someone please check the MS headers for the RECT definition?

In our definition, we use INT, while the MinGW people use LONG.
Which one is correct?

Ours:

typedef struct tagRECT
{
    INT  left;
    INT  top;
    INT  right;
    INT  bottom;
} RECT, *PRECT, *LPRECT;

MinGW:

typedef struct tagRECT {
        LONG left;
        LONG top;
        LONG right;
        LONG bottom;
} RECT,*PRECT,*LPRECT;


-- 
Dimi.


Reply via email to