On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > On January 9, 2003 12:14 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > > I'd prefer to avoid C++, but if there's no other choice then of course > > we'll have to do it. I'm still hoping that we can find a way to avoid > > duplicating all that code inside Wine, C++ or not. > > Well, it seems the only worthy alternatives are Mozilla and KHTML, and > they are both written in C++. I am 100% with you on the non-duplicating > bit: even if we get something in the tree, it's not going to be maintained, > and it will bitrot to fast for words. It would be a huge addition and > burden to maintain for the Wine project. > > Galeon does not include Mozilla -- it uses it. There's got to be a way to > use KHTML in a similar manner. Even my first hand approximation (using > the Win32 build of Mozilla) seems like a better option than duplicating > code. If we get that working, I'm sure we can work with the Mozilla team > to find a way of embedding the Linux version. Heck, Galeon does it!
Actually there already was a Konqueror / WINE integration already, called reaktivate. It replaced urlmon and provided a IWebBrowser interface. Ciao, Marcus
