Duane Clark wrote:
Tony Lambregts wrote:
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Well, yes, if we really need to change the fstype it should be a
generic option that allows all types to be specified, not just
NTFS. And it shouldn't overload the existing "type" parameter, it
should be a separate entry.
OK. I guess my biggest problem with this is that the most obvious
name for this entry is "Filesytem" which is already used <g>.
Since the parameter of interest is specifically named "fsname" rather
than "fstype" or "Filesystem", perhaps that should be the configurable
parameter name. I would think that would eliminate any confusion.
Yes, but how about "FSname" (it looks better in the config file)
--
Tony Lambregts
