On 26 Feb 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Sure, but there's no need for a getopt-specific library, it can use > the normal portability mechanisms of libwine (though I'm planning to > split the portability bits of libwine into a separate lib, but that's > a different issue...)
Oh no, I didn't mean a getopt-specific library. I was just under the impression that you didn't want the tools (such as wrc) be linked with libwine, since I've noticed that port.h disables the usage of certain functions for which we already have alternative implementations in libwine (like strcasecmp). But that was just a cursory look, maybe I misread that. But also, IIRC, I've submitted something adding a getopt_long to libwine, but you opted for the current scheme: http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2002/12/0063.html Sure, it was just the shell :), but would building on that work for you? -- Dimi.
