> Er... I didn't mean it to be submitted right now, only > getting some comments on it (thanks!). But below is the > patch nevertheless (the new listbox.c file is attached). > Reading the devel list it also became obvious that there is > wine-patches, where I should send the final patches, should > I?
Send all patches there, unless you are absolutely certain they'd never be accepted! I'd send this one along, then watch the wine-cvs list archives. If your patch doesn't get accepted, Alexandre might reply to it on this list with why he doesn't like it, or sometimes you have to give him a poke. Sometimes other people will reply with comments on a pending patch. > So: is this kind of hackery acceptable for eventual > inclusion? If nobody objects, I will go on improving it (I > already did so) and occasionally send it to wine-patches. Please do so. One of the GUI guys will comment shortly I expect. > Hmm. What is that "patch Patch police"? :) Bwahahaah. The people who make sure your patch is in the right format (unified diff, not wrapped by the mailer) -- Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> QinetiQ - Malvern Technology Center
