"Tony Lambregts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I'm not sure Alexandre will like it. Until for now, creation of the circular > >dependencies were prohibitted. Probably it's better to use swprintf from ntdll, > > > &*#@ Well. I am very much at the end of my rope here. As I said from the > begining I could not find a way to use swprintf. If there is a way it is > not obvious. Now I may be thick at times but IMO there should be a way > of using swprintf here. So what am I missing.
There should be a way of using at least exported unicode APIs from ntdll, but currently there is no even a header with their function prototypes. Probably a better way would be to add wrappers for ntdll unicode APIs to wine_unicode and use them instead. Alexandre, what way would you prefer? Or perhaps some other one? > >or a set of calls strcpyW/ntdll._ultow/strcatW. > > > I would prefer not to use this workaround except as a last resort. At > least, I would like some definitive reason why we can't use swprintf. Agreed. > so this would be better. [patch skipped] Looks much better now. Thanks for your efforts. -- Dmitry.
