"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, we can look at it this way as well. But then, why not have > those things use the same format as well? > > relay:trace: > server:trace: > > is not that bad...
The current format is just fine IMO. Relay traces are already large enough, we don't need to add another 15 characters to every line. > Indeed. But why have this ambiguity in the first place. We should > take first wine options, then the program. No mixing. We already > support: > > wine --wine-options -- program ... > > IIRC, all we have to do is disable any wine option recognition > after we detect the program name, no? For wine itself yes, but you can't do that for Winelib apps. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
