Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The wineserver seems the most logical choice, but I'm not sure if there > are any special rules regarding it, nor whether Alexandre would accept > stuff like interface probing into the server, it might be considered > bloat. Care to comment Alexandre? Which is the best place for this code?
I don't think we want to have 'magic' registry entries that are computed dynamically, at least not inside the normal branches. There are dynamic branches like HKEY_DYN_DATA where we will need that, but I think the rest should use the normal update mechanisms. For things like plugging in a new interface, there should already be callback scripts in Linux that you can hook into to set the corresponding registry key. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
