On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 18:51:52 +0200, Eric Pouech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>what didn't you like in gdb and winedbg ? The interface is quite annyoing. A lot to type again and again. In pICE I have all the relevant information at one glance. I was also thinking of adding user space support, so that you can use pICE also as a normal debugger with a user space GUI. I think there may be already some support for such a feature but I didn't have time to look at all the code. Also I didn't manage to get hardware breakpoints to work and I got no response on my question about this. >trying to port pice to wine would be rather an heavy task I haven't thought it an easy task either. :) But this is something that might interest me. Also I wasn't thinking of actually porting pICE to wine. Rather I thought, if this is possible of course, to write something like a plug-in mechanism, where wine could be supported through. I don't know if this is possible or how much work this is yet. the advantage of such a system could be to provide a debugger that may support other projects as well (like bochs). Bochs is just an example. I know that they have some debugger support, but I don't know how good it is and what it can do and what not. >I don't really what you will gain with pICE A much better user interface and also a more powerfull debugger (I assume) than gdb is. I know that gdb is quite good and I work with it also but I don't really like it. From the pointer of usabillity I think that i.E. Visual Studio is much nicer and also SoftICE has a much better user interface. I can still see the advantages of gdb's user interface so this is not an issue. >I personnaly don't see an interest. It's already a burden to maintain >winedbg, so maintaining a second debugger doesn't seem right to me You wouldn't have to maintain it because it is a seperate project. I was just feeling out if there is interest (personally I have it) and what would be needed in order to achieve this. >ROS port uses a specific device driver, which will be fun to implement >in wine Could you tell me a bit more about this? >winedbg has been inspired by gdb, but it is not an extension of gdb (as >a standalone debugger). But, you're may be talking of the proxy feature >of winedbg which lets gdb talk to wine thru gdb's remote protocol Ah. Because of this I thought that winedbg would be a frontend like wdb. Only that it is no GUI frontend but a code frontend. >Again, I don't see what pICE will bring you that you don't have in gdb >or winedbg. IMO, you should start by explaining this. I hope that I answered this. :) -- Gerhard Gruber F�r jedes menschliche Problem gibt es immer eine einfache L�sung: Klar, einleuchtend und falsch. (Henry Louis Mencken)
