Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, I think it unbreaks InstallShield, which is a fantastically > common application. It might be a case of a "lesser of two evils" > decision.
No it's a "correct vs. wrong" decision. The existing code is correct and there's no reason to break it, even if doing that happens to mask another bug. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
