Re: [winegcc03] winewrap can handle the default output name

[Richard Cohen]

Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
The reason I've handled it in winegcc rather than winewrap is that
this seems to be a (historical) feature that's specific to gcc, and
there doesn't seem to be any reason to have such a feature perpetuated
in winewrap.
winegcc <-> gcc, winewrap<->ld

$ man ld
...
       -o output
       --output=output
           Use  output  as the name for the program produced by
           ld; if this option is not specified, the name  a.out
           is used by default.  The script command "OUTPUT" can
           also specify the output file name.
Anyone up for renaming winewrap to wineld ? ;-}

Richard.