On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 22:30, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > On August 21, 2003 10:20 pm, Jeremy Newman wrote: > > > I don't play with SGML much, but it should be possible to have the SGML > > output a modified HTML format, John Sheets did it once for me to have > > the SGML output SHTML with the correct includes. If we could get it to > > output in my .template format with the correct paths for links, then > > everyone would be happy. > > Would that allow us to get rid of the SHTML for Docs? Whatever happened > to the patch I sent it long time ago to simply publish the HTML instead > of the SHTML? Why are we keeping the darn thing?
Yes, finally it would. And... I know you'll like the fact the docs would then match the site design. Your patch sat on the back burner so long it burnt up and disappeared. Oops. ;) -- Jeremy Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CodeWeavers, Inc.
