On August 22, 2003 12:53 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > I don't think the problem is so much with internal definitions, pretty > much all of them are gone at this point. The problem is really with > extensions that we want to make available to applications too, like > the extra languages. We could have a wine/extensions.h header, but I'm > not convinced we can really move everything there without creating a > big mess.
What sort of mess do you forsee? All I expect is that we'll have a series of patches that will (a) move one such extension to the new header, and (b) explicitly add the include to all the affected .c files. I think this will make the mingw work a lot simpler. And in general, it will make things a lot more explicit in terms of what is standard and what is a Wine extension, and this is good. Do we get the go ahead? :) -- Dimi.
