--- Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I see. I think the idea with winegcc at this point is that if you > install Wine in a non-standard directory, you have to specify the > include path yourself, just like you need to ensure the Wine tools are > in your PATH. Besides, this shouldn't be an issue once the standard > includes are fixed to no longer reference the wine/obj_* ones.
I was also thinking about submitting a patch to move any of the *16 headers and internal headers that dont exist in the PSDK to include/wine. Is this ok? Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
