On September 29, 2003 01:24 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > I was thinking we could use --dll, since that's what we are ultimately > building; and it fits well with --exe.
Agreed, --dll is a better choice. > > So for this to work (say we have a MyStuff.DLL), I would add > > a -lMyStuff, and I'd have to have a MyStuff.DEF (?.def?) and > > MySfuff.DLL (?.dll?) into my -L dirs? > > It should be named libMyStuff.def, by analogy with libMyStuff.a that > you'd use with mingw; but we could make it support MyStuff.def too if > needed. You don't need the dll at link time, only at run time. I'm afraid libMyStuff.def is a bit too Unix-like, I *think* it's a lot more common in the Windows universe to have it called MyStuff.def. But I don't know exactly if people even know what a .def file is these days :), and I have little knowledge how folks are naming their .def files, so ... -- Dimi.
