Trading off configurability with usability seems fine to
me. I doubt you'd hear much complaining about the default
configuration not being correct and users wanting to edit
it. In either case if the same can be accomplished
without including the config files in the binary then that
of course is preferrable as long as these files are picked
up by the package maintainers. The goal is to solve both
the lack of config files for binary installs, fixed by the
patches that Che has in his rpm package and Marcus has for
Suse, and for users that run 'make install' but never
create config files.
Chris
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:11:44 +0100
"Ivan Leo Murray-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The less modification to the install process the better.
>If there was a single location the files could be
installed to that would work for all distros I think this
is the route to head in.
You can install the files anywhere, as long as the
location isn't already used
for something else, /etc/wine could do.
Also, compiling the files means nobody could change the
default config without
recompiling wine, that sound short of weird.
Ivan.
