> > Nobody has yet added typelib stuff to widl, eh... I guess I could whip > > up a framework or something to help with that, since nobody else has yet > > done it... > > Actually, in the last 4 days I recruited somebody to hack on this from > IRC. He seems pretty competent and is currently implementing the > ICreateTypeLib[2] interfaces I think. Alexander (nyef), are you tracking > wine-devel yet?
That's lucky, because I was going to work on that. I thought about moving all of the typelib stuff to a library (because ITypeLib and ICreateTypeLib must be part of the same object), so that we could use it from widl as part of the build process. > If you could work on the widl backend of course that'd be fantastic. I'm > still hoping to get back to properly submitting your DCOM/apartments work > soon, but I have 3 or 4 higher priority things on my todo list currently. > > I think once those two things are done we'll be able to make do without > native DCOM in like 95% of cases..... we'd still need it for code that > uses NdrClientCall but I think that'd be the only major missing feature > remaining. I have a load of code that implements NdrClientCall2 (what's the difference between NdrClientCall and NdrClientCall2?). I am just starting work on NdrServerCall2/NdrStubCall2. Rob
