(sent this to the wrong email address, sorry) On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 07:08, Mike Hearn wrote: > Why do you explicitly null terminate this string? It shouldn't be needed, > right?
Not sure what the deal was but I was getting segfaults unless I null terminated it myself. Now, it doesn't, so must have been something stupid that I had done. > Ideally of course this stuff would go via the transaction system (so in > the hypothetical future users can undo it, and we can delay it until the > user hits apply in explicit-apply mode). I forgot about that and I had wondered what those functions were, well now I know. I will try to make it work with that later today if I have some free time. Also, one thing that I have a question about; If I remove an application from the 'Applications' tab, shouldn't it not show up in the 'Libraries' tab? This is something I tried to look into but I didn't get too far. I switched to SHDeleteKey, and once I figure out the transaction system I will get that going. Thanks for your time to review it, I hope to add some more functionality soon. This patch seems to be mostly a copy-paste from another function.
