>> This may be a fine thing to do for another project, but this is
>> not a Wine thing, sorry.
>OK, but at least the vb runtime and the win installer should be there. Nobody is
>implementing, or, AFAIK, planning to implement these parts of windows at the
>moment, and without them many programs simply have no hope of working with wine.
>We may also want to list dcom, as we even had it up on the sf page at one time.

The vbrun shouldn't be necessary as any program needing it should have
provided it in the setup itself. Even if people just try to run programs installed
on the mounted real Windows drive the dll should be seen, no? And if a prog
doesn't provide the dll it should have at least a readme to tell people where
to get it.

bye  Fabi



Reply via email to