Point is.. it works, it's compliant letter for letter with the MSDN docs, and it doesn't break anything.
Don't see why it would need more testing. On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 13:41, Mike McCormack wrote: > Andrei Barbu wrote: > > > So I'm guessing this is right now. > > > > I don't have a windows computer to check this against, but it does > > comply with the docs. > > I have a feeling you'll need to be a bit more thorough than that to get > your patch applied. > > Mike >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part