Rob Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At present, if the size of the buffer passed to snprintfW is too small > then the function returns -1, as opposed to the required size of the > buffer (as per C snprintf). This greatly limits its usefulness and can > give incorrect results for those using the function that don't > explicitly check for -1 being returned. A grep of the source tree shows > that nothing depends on this behaviour.
Actually, something does depend on it: it is used to implement _vsnwprintf in ntdll, so you can't change it. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
