Hi Eric, I suspected that might be the case. It just takes a little bit of guessing to find the previous expression, since its size is not fixed.
Thanks, Walter > > no, we should point to the correct insn, I'll look into it. > in fact, it'll be hard to change it. ia-32 reports insn after the one > that triggers the watch. The rationale beeing that you must execute the > insn in order to now of the write change (unlike a seg fault where you > cannot know execute the insn). > GDB behaves the same (it shows the line after the one that triggered the > watch). >
