Michael Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2. A more technical question: LibTomCrypt's original sources are highly > customizable (A lot of conditional compilation and hook-functions). Since we > have fairly special requirements for rsaenh, I could cut down the source code > a lot. However, this would make it harder to incorporate code from a newer > version of libtomcrypt, once it becomes available. Which way is preferable? > Having less code or beeing easily upgradeable?
In general having less code is preferable, assuming it's not just a few percent less. In particular getting rid of #ifdefs is strongly encouraged. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
